Skip to main content

Why do you think that the US could lose it’s top position as a world leader?

  Why do you think that the US could lose it’s top position as a world leader? Photo by Kenny Eliason on Unsplash Sadly, some of the things you have been saying are good assessments of the situation and I believe there is credibility there for why the US is on a down spiral. #1) The Russians figured something out quite a while ago and they ran an experiment in the US in 2016 to see if it was true. People go up in arms that it was to mess with the election and yes, it was partly but that wasn’t the point in itself. By getting that hacker team to focus on the US they were able to spread disinformation and sow seeds of discord that had incalculable effects moving forwards. That hacker group a) showed the world that the US was vulnerable b) it showed that democracy has some major weaknesses that can be exploited c) it showed the threat of total free speech and free speech of the press d) it made the American electoral system seem fraudulent, or at very least not a credible and fair system
Post a Comment

What are the potential drawbacks of nationalizing an industry?

 What are the potential drawbacks of nationalizing an industry?



It depends on what industry and what the purpose of nationalizing it is. The industries that it makes the most sense to nationalize have some criteria in my opinion:

They should be static industries that do not change very much or very quickly in terms of the core of it’s business.

It should be an industry that is key to public security, public safety, or the public’s interest.

It should be something that is mammoth in size so that it doesn’t affect any small businesses by having it nationalized.

It should add value by nationalizing it - such as continuity, consistency, stability etc. There should be a pain point that is needing to be addressed that centralizing that industry under the government addresses it.

It should be specialized enough that there is not a lot of competition. It wouldn’t be small business or medium businesses getting put out of business - it should be an industry where it would be cost prohibitive for anyone from the lower class, or middle class, or even the upper lower class from venturing into.

It should be to provide the service with bottom dollar prices for the people. It’s the peoples company so they should enjoy the benefit of having the lowest rates in that industry.

I know where I live we have auto insurance nationalized so to speak. What I pay for car insurance in a year people are paying per month in the state next to us. I pay around a grand per year and I’ve got friends paying 900 per month.

Our energy and power prices are pretty low considering we have 157,000 km of power line where Texas has 74,800km with ERCOT, California has 106,681 km with PG&E. 7.6 people per km of line where i live, versus 367 per km in California and 394 people per km in Texas. Where I live its 0.14 per kWh, California is 0.40 per kWh, and Texas 0.20 KWh.

So that 157,000 km of powerline to maintain with 7.6 people per km at 0.14 kWh

California 106,681 km with 367 people per km at a rate of 0.40 per kWh

Texas is 74,800 km with 394 people per km at a rate of 0.20 kWh

That there above is why you nationalize big industries that are in the public interests as it provides the lowest possible price against companies that basically hold a monopoly because there are so few of them out there. The significance of the breakdown I provided shows the amount of maintenance line that must be maintained and the tax base or the rate base in how many people per km of line will be paying for that maintenance and then the rate that those people have to pay. As you can see, privatization is great for industries that need to be flexible, agile, and strive for maximum innovation but in static industries they just are cash cows for the rich.

The drawbacks are that you have to stick pretty closely to that rule set or you’ll risk stagnating the economy or at least that industry because nationalized companies tend to provide service for rock bottom prices but they often tend to lack in innovation. They also are at risk for being scavenged from the Government when they miss their budget numbers and have to make up the money before election time.

Elections and public issues and scandals tend to slow business right down and at times nearly handicap them because the government wants nothing controversial in the election period so they can often order business to stop some activities temporarily in order to make sure there is no scandal or problem during the election. So, public companies certainly have their drawbacks as well but, all in all - in the right industry they are a good thing for the people.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What was really the historical cause of the war between Israel and Palestine?

 What was really the historical cause of the war between Israel and Palestine? Photo by  Fernández Salas | Unsplash The conflict started over 2000 years ago when the Romans invaded the Middle East and started enforcing their style of law on the people. It roots back to the days when Jesus was killed as the New Testament states that the Jews were chanting for the crucifixion of Jesus and the Romans were interested in keeping control but also of snuffing out some of the religious problems they were having as Jews advocated one God, and it caused a great deal of problems for the Roman religious system. After the death of Jesus, the Romans were in conflict with the Jewish people for another 150 years when they finally broke the resistance and disbanded the Jews, casting them out from the territory. It was this dispersion of people that would serve as a bit an anomaly in the typical conquered people’s history, as usually the people get absorbed into the other people that conquer because of
Post a Comment
Read more

Why was the Fender Rose Wood Telecaster the only guitar George Harrison hated?

 Why was the Fender Rose Wood Telecaster the only guitar George Harrison hated? This indeed seems to be a question which has some irony built into it. George Harrison was given a Fender Rose Wood Telecaster in 1967 as a gift by Fender. His guitar would become iconic as it would make it’s way into the ‘Let it be’ video as well as it was used for their last public performance. So iconic is that guitar, that Fender decided to do a George Harrison Tele release and my good God is it a gorgeous guitar, yet; George only kept it for around a year as he would give it away in 1969. Ultimately the reason why he gave it away was because of the weight of the guitar. Being a solid body the guitar weighed a ton and he found it too much weight on the straps for it to be comfortable. The person that George gave the guitar to would hold onto it until 2 years after George’s death. His widow would buy the guitar for under a half million. Still, despite George only owning the guitar for a year it made its
Post a Comment
Read more

Why are people at the bottom class so easily used by people at the top?

  Why are people at the bottom class so easily used by people at the top? Photo by  Andrea De Santis  on  Unsplash People that are on the bottom are easy to be used by anybody for anything. That’s the point of keeping people on the bottom is so that way you have an expendable population that will be ‘servant like’ in their complacency and will not spend a lot of time fighting against the system. There’s a natural balance that has to be achieved for this to occur. You have to keep people down low enough that their main focus is survival. If you keep the bulk of them right at this poverty level, where the only thing that that’s on their mind is getting to work and getting their paycheck so that way they can keep their power on, and keep the lights on, and keep the heat going, and some food in the cupboard, then as a ruling elite you’re laughing. As a ruler you’re laughing because the people have enough hope that they can still be something more than what they are but, at the same time th
Post a Comment
Read more