Skip to main content

If the Vietnam war began in 1955, does that mean it lasted 20 years, it ended in 1975?

  If the Vietnam war began in 1955, does that mean it lasted 20 years, it ended in 1975? Photo by  Sander Sammy  on  Unsplash No, the Vietnam War began in 1858 when the French first invaded the country. The war with the French then took a short break over 1941–1945 when Japan had invaded Vietnam and when Japan surrendered the territory went back to the French despite Ho Chi Minhs calls for support of Vietnam’s independence. As a result, in 1945 Ho Chi Minh created the Viet Minh which fought the French until the siege of 1954 when the French surrendered in Dien Bien Phu. Americans, had a fear of communism spreading due to the stupid ‘Domino theory’ which had absolutely no basis in fact and might as well been a joke card pulled from a crackerjack box. The Americans decided that with the French pulling out of Vietnam, then with Ho Chi Minh by this time firmly with the Communists, the US had felt it prudent to ensure that Vietnam did not turn to communism. Ultimately the US was scared spit

Is there any difference between the United States and Canada? If so, how is that possible?

 

Is there any difference between the United States and Canada? If so, how is that possible?


·
Photo by Brianna R. on Unsplash

Well, USA no doubt has a large influence on Canada as our main trading partner and main source of entertainment (movies etc) the USA has a lot of influence but, our history is unique and it did create a very distinct group that has some key differences between us and the US.

The biggest of them is around the idea of socialism. The US treats Socialism like it’s the boogie man and the beginning of the end of modern society. It’s actually pretty humorous to hear some of the vitriol statements towards socialism and the ill-informed debates that happen down there over it.

Independence — Canada is more Peaceful

Don’t get me wrong, we still have our nut jobs and jerks here, but we are as a whole less belligerent than the US and the reason comes down to our unique history.

The United States went to war with England to become independent. The results of them winning that war had all the United States people who were still loyal to the crown — they moved to Canada.

We were a small nation still back then so those that moved here created a big surge of population. These people were all against the US declaring war on England. So, this polarizing stance ver England was a natural barrier for us not to become Americanized.

Canada went a more peaceful route for independence, and they introduced each transfer of responsibility through passing Acts and legislation. More and more responsibility and authority came to Canada and finally, in 1982, Canada finally repatriated the constitution. We would also choose to and we continue our connection to the royal family as part of our cultural tradition.

Not one shot was fired for our independence but, it did take us 200 extra years to attain it — well, arguably the British North American act of 1867 largely made the biggest move towards independence . It wasn’t until World War 1 though that Canada truly began to feel like a nation.

World War I brought Canadians together as a nation and proved itself as a contender on the global stage worthy of respect because of what our soldiers and people back home were able to do in support of England.

Canada as a nation may have been forged by World War I, however the fact remains that legally it was not wholly independent until they repatriated our Constitution.

Right to Bear Arms

Another noteworthy trait difference is that the Americans are more belligerent in general, and I believe it is due to the right to bear arms. The one constitutional point was meant so that the US could always raise a militia should the British decide at a later date that they wished to have the Americas back under their flag. This was a real serious concern for the forefathers, so they made sure that America would always be able to raise an army if attacked.

Canada does not have the same attachment to firearms as the US does. Again, this is another point that cracks me up when I hear it that if the US implemented gun controls, they would lose the streets to gangs almost immediately.

The guns are the only thing that keeps the people safe from the gangs. Meanwhile, a hundred miles north and you’ve got a country that has no guns and what there are for gangs sure don’t roma the streets with any ownership that I’ve ever seen.

Civil Rights Movement

The Civil rights movement in the US Was much more polarized and violent although, with ours we did have some terrorism that went on for a period over Quebe’s role in Canada’s future.

There was one point where a few people were killed and someone was kidnapped etc. Generally speaking the Canadian civil rights movement had been a bit more civil.

The Civil rights movement led to a civil war in the first phase to declare blacks free and then in the 1900s it was quite polarizing and violent because of the racism and fear that people had. In the end, the US often times seems like our rich borderline sister.

Everything that happens is disproportional from our perspective, and it's from one end of reason to the far end of unreasonable in terms of emotional shifting and dysregulation.

Self Focus

Lastly, America traditionally has been very self focused. They were brought onto the stage as police for the Wetern way of life after World War II. The responsibility seen the country step up at key times to make a big difference on the world stage but, it also had the effect of making Americans feel unappreciated and foreigners feeling as though the US will rattle it’s saber in order to silently force countries to comply with their desires.

This imporance on the world stage had the effect of making the US center stage all of the time and the people in general had become very self focused. If you take the average American and started quizzing them about history of other countries and not many will be able to tell you all that much.

Their school systems for years focused on American history and neglected Mexico or Canadian history. Most Americans really have no idea where our provincial capitals are or any of our history at all. Canadians on the other hand have focused on American history and world history so there is a much better chance of finding a Canadian that knows a lot about American than to find an American tha knows a lot about Canada.

So, the inwards focus and effects of being center stage, the manner in which the US fought for independence, the aggressive and at times belligerent attitudes due to a self focused’ country and ith the consitituional right to bear arms, many Americans have a more cavalier attitude towards weapons which manifests itself in atittude lastly the very distinct history of each country is what had allowed for Canada to emerge as a tightly linked partner of the United States but with very different cultures.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What was really the historical cause of the war between Israel and Palestine?

 What was really the historical cause of the war between Israel and Palestine? Photo by  Fernández Salas | Unsplash The conflict started over 2000 years ago when the Romans invaded the Middle East and started enforcing their style of law on the people. It roots back to the days when Jesus was killed as the New Testament states that the Jews were chanting for the crucifixion of Jesus and the Romans were interested in keeping control but also of snuffing out some of the religious problems they were having as Jews advocated one God, and it caused a great deal of problems for the Roman religious system. After the death of Jesus, the Romans were in conflict with the Jewish people for another 150 years when they finally broke the resistance and disbanded the Jews, casting them out from the territory. It was this dispersion of people that would serve as a bit an anomaly in the typical conquered people’s history, as usually the people get absorbed into the other people that conquer because of

Why was the Fender Rose Wood Telecaster the only guitar George Harrison hated?

 Why was the Fender Rose Wood Telecaster the only guitar George Harrison hated? This indeed seems to be a question which has some irony built into it. George Harrison was given a Fender Rose Wood Telecaster in 1967 as a gift by Fender. His guitar would become iconic as it would make it’s way into the ‘Let it be’ video as well as it was used for their last public performance. So iconic is that guitar, that Fender decided to do a George Harrison Tele release and my good God is it a gorgeous guitar, yet; George only kept it for around a year as he would give it away in 1969. Ultimately the reason why he gave it away was because of the weight of the guitar. Being a solid body the guitar weighed a ton and he found it too much weight on the straps for it to be comfortable. The person that George gave the guitar to would hold onto it until 2 years after George’s death. His widow would buy the guitar for under a half million. Still, despite George only owning the guitar for a year it made its